Removing Regulatory Roadblocks
Expediting Market Access
> For some special new chemical substances, such as those can only exist in acidic solution or pyrophoric substances, would they be notified without physico-chemical testing data, or with data merely generated from QSAR studies rather than the testing data?
> Substance A is not listed in the IECSC after comprehensive search. The substance is a functional component of a product. The notified amount should be less than 1t/y and the substance is subject to the general case of simplified notification. Although the substance is excluded from the IECSC, its homologous substances, e.g. potassium salt and ammonium salt of its cation, have been included in the IECSC. Additionally, the substance’s function is mainly determined by its cationic part. If to notify the substance through the general case of simplified notification, is it acceptable to directly use the data of the potassium salt of its cation, instead of carrying out tests on the substance A?
How to determine the hazard classification of mixtures?
If the new chemical substances has already been notified under SEPA Order 17 (predecessor of MEP Order 7), is it necessary to comply with the scientific research record notification under MEP Order 7?
What chemicals need to be registered?
What hazardous chemicals need to go through legal inspection?
Is registration needed if paint is imported, sub-packaged as commodities, and sold to downstream companies for direct selling in the market?
ChemLinked Chemical Portal was created to provide chemical regulatory information for China and
the rest of the Asia Pacific region to meet the growing demand for clear and concise regulatory
advice and market intelligence.
ChemLinked is based in China, our office hour is 9:00 - 17:30 GMT+8 Beijing time.
Skype: ChemLinked Official
Phone: +86 (0) 571 8710 3812
© 2012-2017 ChemLinked
Term of Use